Outside of that there are some work to make it work but the rules from online docs seem to be that if the hardware was from before 2012 and not a tested configuration, it should stick to RHEL-6. So RHEL-7 was released in 2014, so tested hardware configurations from 2014-2018 should work. This hardware is usually on the year of release to 4 years afterwards. Upstream (RHEL) usually expects hardware that is confirmed to work to be usable through the release time. “How old hardware should be expected to work.” Again this is not the core issue the original person was asking. I think we are rabbit-holing on a bunch of related issues:ġ. And before someone suggests it, the 2010-vintage server I’m trying to install CentOS on does not support booting from a thumb drive, so that option is not available.

We need to ask the developers to make a re-spin that’s about 5MB I have tried burning this same iso image on two different machines: a CentOS 7.9 server and a Fedora 33 laptop. Iso image: 4,712,300,544 bytes User Anthony F McInerney advises Wikipedia says DVD-R capacity: 4,707,319,808 bytes (max) ISO image: CentOS-7-x86_6.iso 4.7GB raw CD image Wed Nov 4 05:37:25 2020īurners: Both K3B and Brasero Media: Both DVD-R and DVD+R single-layer disks Could anyone familiar with it please file a bug on my behalf? Particulars: I gotta say it is one of the most complicated and imposing front ends I’ve ever seen.

I need help from someone experienced with the CentOS bug tracking system.

Centos 7 x86_64